top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe Big Magazine Staff

Scott Peterson’s new trial rests on original juror nicknamed ‘Strawberry Shortcake’

By The Big Magazine Staff

Convicted murderer, Scott Peterson may get a second chance in front of a jury. Lawyers for Peterson are ready to make a case for a new trial Friday as a key hearing gets underway in San Mateo County Superior Court.

Scott Peterson sits with his attorney Mark Geragos, right, during arraignment proceedings in Stanislaus Superior Court on Dec. 3, 2003. Bart Ah You - AP

The hearing will feature one witness’ testimony that could determine if he gets a second chance in front of a jury.

After a lengthy trial that captivated the nation in the early 2000s, a jury found Peterson guilty of murdering his pregnant wife Laci and their unborn son, Conner.

Peterson, 49, was sentenced to death in 2005 but he was resentenced to life without parole in December. The California Supreme Court tossed out his original sentence in 2020 on grounds that the jury was improperly screened for bias against the death penalty.

But now, San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo is tasked with determining whether Peterson got a fair trial or not, based upon an allegation of juror misconduct.

On Friday, an evidentiary hearing that is expected to last around a week will begin. It will ultimately decide if Peterson gets a new trial.

“The issue is whether or not one of the jurors — Juror 7 — withheld information, or lied during the jury selection,” said retired Judge Anne-Christine Massullo , who followed the case closely. “In jury selection, prospective jurors are to tell the truth. That means to not omit things, or to not just blatantly lie. The issue is whether or not Juror 7 lied by not revealing that when she was pregnant, she had been the victim of violence in a domestic relationship.”

That juror, Richelle Nice, will be the first person to take the stand and testify on Friday. Peterson’s defense team argues Nice lied on her jury questionnaire and was biased against him.

In a 2017 interview with the Modesto Bee, Nice insisted, “I did not lie to get on this trial to fry Scott.”

“Her testimony is going to be critical,” Cordell said. “She’s been granted immunity. So she’s required now to answer all questions. She can’t take the 5th once that happens. If she does, the judge will likely hold her in contempt, and she could go to jail.”

Judge Massullo will have 90 days to render a decision, that will determine whether Peterson will spend the rest of his life in prison, or will get a new trial.

Ultimately, it comes down to two important questions: was there juror misconduct? And if so, was the degree of the misconduct enough to warrant a new trial? It will be up to Judge Massullo to decide.

Follow us on Instagram @TheBigMagazine


bottom of page